You can’t open a newspaper or watch a televised newscast without hearing about someone who has been injured or killed by a gun. Gun violence is a juicy story after all. With all of this attention, it makes reasonable sense that we have a strong movement to limit the number of guns in society. But, are we really addressing a real problem or are we constructing an illusion? The crux of the argument for and against gun control focuses on the 2nd Amendment to the Constitution of United States.
“A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed.”
The real argument seems to fixate on grammar and capitalization. This could keep all of the English professors in the United States busy in perpetuity. I would suggest that 2nd Amendment is written to protect each citizen’s right to keep and bear arms. The foundation of this country is based on the common person’s ability to own fire arms. Our earliest battles relied heavily on the self reliance and ability of our citizens to rise up and defend ourselves. Some would argue this is a fact that has since passed its need or practicality. But, has it? I would consider our current state of security threatened and easily imbalanced in the new world of terrorism. We don’t know when or where the next attack will take place, or what kind of attack it will be.
I’m a veteran. I received military training on the proper use of firearms. I don’t own an AR-15 or a RPG today. However, I do own various weapons easily purchased from Dick’s Sporting Goods. Now, I’m sure someone will be quick to tell me that guns kill people. You won’t get an argument out of me on that. I take the ownership of these weapons very seriously and practice responsible storage and handling procedures.
Being realistic you have to also admit that people aren’t killed by guns alone. The list of lethal weapons is long, so let’s look at some of the other weapons. The knife does a fine job, as well as the baseball bat, shovel, hammer, beer bottle, rock… Left alone or used properly none of these things will kill another person, guns included. It’s not the weapon that kills; it’s the person using it.
Absent of me owning a gun or having access to one, if someone breaks into my house and threatens my family, you can bet that something in my home is going to be a weapon even if it’s my own hands and teeth. Forgive me, but war vets tend to be this way. Beyond the scenario where the safety of my home is threatened and is expanded to be my community, you can bet that I will step up to protect my neighbors should it be necessary. And, I know many of my brothers and sisters at American Legion Post 98 will be there as well. That’s what veterans do.
Okay, but I have left out gun violence and criminal activity. Is this a gun problem or a behavioral issue? It’s unreasonable to believe that we can eradicate guns or prevent the criminal element from getting their mitts on them. Even if we were successful, there would still be the Ginsu knife, Louisville Sluggers bat, Ames shovel, True Temper hammer, Samuel Adams beer bottle and glacial rock to be misused in the act of a crime.
How do we deal with the gun problem? Good question!